2006/6/7, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:35:54AM +0200, Antonio Montagnani wrote: > >The easiest is to let smart/yum/apt do their job with something like > > > >yum install madwifi madwifi-`uname -r` > > > >(you need to activate atrpms in your depsolver setup). > > > >If you need to download by hand then probably you will need (for i686, > >non-smp, non-xen0): > > > >http://dl.atrpms.net/all/madwifi-0.9.0-23.rhfc5.at.i386.rpm > >http://dl.atrpms.net/all/madwifi-kmdl-2.6.16-1.2122_FC5-0.9.0-23.rhfc5.at.i686.rpm > >http://dl.atrpms.net/all/madwifi-hal-kmdl-2.6.16-1.2122_FC5-0.9.0-23.rhfc5.at.i686.rpm > > > you may have missed a post of mine. > I have a D-link G650 that is working with madwifi from your repository > FC5-0.9.0-20. > When I upgarded to FC5-0.9.0-23 I got some errors from kismet. > Can you check??? I replied to that post. In a nutshell: madwifi's interface changed from what is today known as madwifi-old to madwifi-ng, where the latter is now the offcial madwifi. Check madwifi.org for further details/differences between the two branches. > A further comment: if you have an Atheros chip on your card I suggest > to use ATrpm repository as procedure is straightforward, you have only > ath0 in your network.... I'm not sure I understand, you mean that madwifi hides away your wired ethX interfaces? That shouldn't happen, if it does it's bug. :/ -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Axel I apologize but I missed your reply that clarifies everything.... About the second point, when I installed from a different repository than yours, I found eth1 and ath0 in the network configuration tool. By your repo, I found only ath0, as it should be. Rgds -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag
