On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 14:30 -0700, Brian Gaynor wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 15:49 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:19 -0400, Dan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I agree, I also have preferred lilo. I don't know why someone would > > > > make the move wholesale to Grub with such a massive gorilla as a RAID1 > > > > bug in the room, doesn't make sense to me. Lilo has always performed > > > > well with RAID0 and RAID1 combos and I've never been able to get grub to > > > > install correctly in those scenarios. > > > > > > > > I'm getting ready to find out wether FC5's grub will handle /boot RAID1 > > > > and RAID0 on the remainder of the partitions. FC3 did not perform in > > > > that regard. I'm going to be mightily peeved if FC5 grub does not > > > > function via RAID. > > > > > > > > LX > > > > > > > Well, for one, grub can easily handle fakeraid 0 and 1 in FC5. :) > > > -Dan > > > > > > > Which won't be helping me much since I do software raid. > > Well, I don't know about RAID0, but I've been very happy with GRUB and > software RAID1 and RAID5 partitions since FC3. I hope you're right. I'm getting ready to find out exactly what is what on raid0/1. LX -- °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° When the ax entered the forest, the trees said, "The handle is one of us!" -- Turkish proverb Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/ °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
