Re: Changing the Bootloader from GRUB to LILO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 14:30 -0700, Brian Gaynor wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 15:49 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:19 -0400, Dan wrote:
> > >     
> > > >
> > > > I agree, I also have preferred lilo.  I don't know why someone would
> > > > make the move wholesale to Grub with such a massive gorilla as a RAID1
> > > > bug in the room, doesn't make sense to me.  Lilo has always performed
> > > > well with RAID0 and RAID1 combos and I've never been able to get grub to
> > > > install correctly in those scenarios.
> > > >
> > > > I'm getting ready to find out wether FC5's grub will handle /boot RAID1
> > > > and RAID0 on the remainder of the partitions.  FC3 did not perform in
> > > > that regard.  I'm going to be mightily peeved if FC5 grub does not
> > > > function via RAID.
> > > >
> > > > LX
> > > >   
> > > Well, for one, grub can easily handle fakeraid 0 and 1 in FC5. :)
> > > -Dan
> > > 
> > 
> > Which won't be helping me much since I do software raid.
> 
> Well, I don't know about RAID0, but I've been very happy with GRUB and
> software RAID1 and RAID5 partitions since FC3.

I hope you're right.  I'm getting ready to find out exactly what is what
on raid0/1.

LX
-- 
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
When the ax entered the forest, the trees said,
"The handle is one of us!"   -- Turkish proverb
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux