Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James, I'm just trying out foresight linux and the wireless support
looks pretty good. It looks like it's built on fedora, or maybe is
quite similar. I tried it because it is gnome.

If you have more than 256M of ram, grab the latest iso (0.9.4mr5) and
give it a go.

On 4/19/06, James Pifer <jep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is wireless support any better with FC5?

I'm on FC4 now and have been using ndiswrapper with a Broadcom card for
some time: Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN
Controller (rev 03). Recently my DLink DI-624 router died and I just got
the replacement. Now I can't get FC4 to reconnect. I can scan the
wireless network and see it, but I can't connect to it.

I've also tried two PCMCIA cards, a DLink DWL-G650 with the Atheros
chipset (I've never got this to work) and a CompUSA card with an unknown
chipset (doesn't work either).

I've also never been able to get WEP to work, so I've been stuck using
no encryption and filtering MACs. I would filter MACs anyway, but would
really like to use WEP, even though it's not the greatest security.

All three of these NICs work fine when I boot to Windows XP.

So I'm wondering if FC5 improves anything. I've heard that SUSE is much
better at handling wireless, but I really like Fedora/Redhat.

Any suggestions are appreciated.

James

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



--
-=/>Thom


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux