On Tue, May 02, 2006 08:51:47 AM -0500, Les Mikesell (lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 08:25, Tim wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 06:55 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > Again no one is insisting anyone should do anything > > > > Well, actually the poster was. They were trying to convince LUGs to do > > something that they weren't doing. > > But what makes you insist that they weren't doing it because they > didn't want to? Perhaps they hadn't thought of it, didn't > understand the need, or weren't aware of the legal requirements > keeping FOSS from being considered for certain uses? Exactly. These same points had already been mentioned in this thread (followed by a "thanks Marco") as a positive outcome of my announce. Thanks... > > Go back and read their original post, and the links that they > > referred to in it (and the backscatter their postings produced), > > and also see Mike McCarty's response (I think it was him, I'm > > doing this by memory). In short, if you think you're going to > > help disabled people by telling them that you're going to help > > them, and that you know better about how to help them, you're > > going to get responses. > > Please quote where anyone said they knew better. ...and thanks again! Marco -- Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Picasso
