On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 15:37 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote: > > I don't want to get into the niceties of the language used, however, > the release of Fedora is definitely not QA based, but time based, > your assertions to the contrary notwithstanding. > > Just see above "We *try* to do a 6 month release cycle...." > Look at the historical release schedule and variations in time. A time based release as you claimed would have meant that a release is made regardless of other factors. > IOW, the basis for release is time lapse. If the quality is so low > that it just isn't reasonable, then it gets held up. So QA is a factor. > > I also recall you making similar false claims earlier as well. > It isn't necessary to remind me. The people who do the release understand the factors better than others who havent been involved with the process. Rahul
