Re: [PHILOSOPHY] Stability and Release Schedules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 07:06:00PM -0400, Mark Haney wrote:

> And this also points to my gripe about Debian.  It's 'stable' isn't very 
> in a lot of cases I've seen.  That and it's a giant pain in the butt to 
> update.

I can provide an anecdote to the contrary. I'm surprised you're using
FC in a production environment. Of course you can use about everything
in a production environment if you yourself do all the work, but that's
exactly the point of using a stable branch of a distro (i.e. RHEL over
FC, stable/testing Debian).

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820            http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux