Re: Missing dependency libpisock.so.8 for evolution

To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 7:14 AM
Subject: Re: Missing dependency libpisock.so.8 for evolution

On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 21:18 -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:

---- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Howarth" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:44 AM
Subject: Re: Missing dependency libpisock.so.8 for evolution


> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 15:01 -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
>> This is likely more a yum question than evolution but here goes...
>>

>> I've installed spamassassin 3.11 via CPAN. This is a level higher >> than

>> what's available using yum.  I would like to update evolution but yum

>> insists that I need to install spamassassin first. Is there any way >> to

>> force the install using yum?  I suppose I could download all the rpm

>> packages (there are several needed to resolve dependencies) and >> install

>> them
>> manually but would prefer to have yum take care of it.
>
> Are you on FC4? FC5 has spamassassin 3.1.1.
>
> Paul.

Yes, I'm still on FC4.  I tried to upgrade to FC5 but ran into network
problems so I dropped back to FC4 until things settle down a little.

One thing you could try would be to rebuild the FC5 spamassassin SRPM on
your FC4 box, which, if successful, would give you a nice, clean
RPM-packaged spamassassin that would satisfy evolution's dep.

Paul.