On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 15:01 -0400, Gerry Doris wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Phil Savoie" <psavoie1783@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:56 PM > Subject: Re: Missing dependency libpisock.so.8 for evolution > > > > On Tuesday 18 April 2006 22:25, Jeffrey D. Yuille wrote: > >> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 19:59 -0400, Erik Hemdal wrote: > >> > Software Updater fails to apply updates on my system because an update > >> > for evolution requires libpisock.so.8. Same thing happens with a > >> > conventional 'yum update' -- the dependency check fails. > >> > > >> > My system has libpisock.so.9 installed with the pilot-link package. > >> > It's a fresh install of FC5. This is only the second yum update I have > >> > run on the machine. So that explains why the dependency is missing, > >> > but > >> > not how it came about. Is this due to a conflict between evolution and > >> > pilot-link; a user error; or a packaging problem somewhere along the > >> > line? > >> > > >> > Can't find anything in the recent list postings, which is why I'm > >> > posting. Anyone else see this? > >> > > >> > Thanks! Erik > >> > >> Yes, I have seen the same thing but at this time, I don't know how > >> to resolve this. > > > > I just waited an hour and updated again. No error this time. > > > > Phil > > This is likely more a yum question than evolution but here goes... > > I've installed spamassassin 3.11 via CPAN. This is a level higher than > what's available using yum. I would like to update evolution but yum > insists that I need to install spamassassin first. Is there any way to > force the install using yum? I suppose I could download all the rpm > packages (there are several needed to resolve dependencies) and install them > manually but would prefer to have yum take care of it. Are you on FC4? FC5 has spamassassin 3.1.1. Paul.