On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:37, Rob Andrews wrote: >On 16-Apr-2006 14:43.13 (BST), Bill Polhemus wrote: > > Is x86_64 appropriate for an AMD 64-bit processor? I thought there > > was a distinction between Intel and AMD for 64 bits. > >AMD's 64-bit processors are x86-64, often also referred to as amd64 > and polluted by Windows x86-64 releases as "x64". This moniker also > applies to CPUs with Intel's EM64T, hence later members of the > Pentium 4 and Xeon 4. > >Intel's Itanium architecture is referred to as ia64. Thanks Rob. Humm, I now have installed the 386 version of FC5, but I told it to put grub in the 1st sector of /dev/hda2, the partition named /boot. But there's no choice of booting anything but XP. I guess this means I have to install it in the mbr of /dev/hda? In which case how do I install it, and whats the magic spell to put into grub.conf so I have a choice of what to boot? Running the rescue cd, and cd'd to /mnt/sysimage, with a shell, a "usr/local/sbin/grub-install /dev/hda" gets me a message that it can't find grub in sbin. Of course its not there, if booted normally it would be in /usr/sbin. Obviously there's something I'm doing wrong in trying to protect the XP install, but how can I fix it and boot the just installed i386 version of FC5? I'd druther not have to go all the way thru another install just to move the grub stuff into the MBR. >-- >rob andrews :: pgp 0xb35ff721 :: > rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
