On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 12:44 -0400, Robert Locke wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 09:16 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > FC5 installed very smoothly on this laptop. No real issues at this > > > point save the Atheros Wireless NIC. > > > > > > 04:02.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212 > > > 802.11abg NIC (rev 01) > > > > > > > > > I installed the livna RPM's: > > > madwifi-0.0.0.20060317-4.lvn5 > > > kmod-madwifi-0.0.0.20060317-3.2.6.16_1.2080_FC5 > > > > > > I have been trying to use NetworkManger (version > > > NetworkManager-0.6.2-1.fc5 from updates testing) to get the connected to > > > my wireless network in any mode(en-encrypted, WEP or WAP). I haven't been having much success at this > > > point. > > > > > > NetworkManager shows several wireless networks available, some locked(shown with a padlock icon) and others unlocked. > > > > > > > > > Anyone got a madwifi HOWTO to point me at for FC5 or a piece of information that > > > I am missing to get me going? > > > > > > > Try copying the three lines from /etc/modprobe.d/madwifi > > into /etc/modprobe.conf. I then rebooted and was able to use > > system-config-network to configure ath0.... I do not use NetworkManager > > nor do I use WPA - so YMMV on those - but I am able to use WEP on my T40 > > and reconfigure it with system-config-network..... > > > > --Rob > > > Hmmm...that didn't seem to do anything for me... > > > Maybe I am tripping over something in NetworkManager ... Looking at the > logs that it generates, it seems that it can't do WPA out of the box or > it is not supported even thought wpa_supplicant is installed(weird). > > What's even weirder is that I can't associate with a wide-open AP. Here > are some logs (/var/log/messages). Maybe someone with a few seconds can > peruse them and tell me what I have screwed up. > > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Activation > (ath0) started... > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Activation > (ath0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) scheduled... > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Old device > 'ath0' activating, won't change. > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Activation > (ath0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) started... > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Activation > (ath0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) scheduled... > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Activation > (ath0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) complete. > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Activation > (ath0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) starting... > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Activation > (ath0/wireless): access point 'NWFSC' is encrypted, but NO valid key > exists. New key needed. > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Activation > (ath0) New wireless user key requested for network 'NWFSC'. > Apr 14 10:42:42 framd NetworkManager: <information> Activation > (ath0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete. > > > At this point(on a AP with WAP), I get a pop-up that states: > "The requested wireless network requires security capabilities > unsupported by your hardware" > > I don't get this message if I use the madwifi-ng RPM's from: > http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~phekda/richdawe/fedora/FC5/i386/ > > I get the WAP password prompt, but that's about it. I attached a log > from that attempt. > > any guidance would be appreciated. > > As I see it, there are two differences between what you are doing and what I am doing. One is NetworkManager and the other is WPA. I would first try eliminating NetworkManager from the picture and see if you can at least get the card happy and connecting either to an open AP or using WPA..... Then I would tackle NetworkManager. I'm also guessing that the Rich Dawe RPMs are using a newer snapshot of madwifi-ng code than what is currently in livna and hence it being closer to working for you. I would really suggest eliminating the layer of NM temporarily just to make sure that stuff is connecting at least, and staying connected for a while.... I am not sure of the current state of WPA in Madwifi either. You might want to consider jumping on their mailing list to get some more help.... --Rob