On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 16:17 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 02:14 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > > That is not exactly what I said. At least that is not I meant. If this > > > Fedora Project Board is supposed to represent the community then > > > comments generally designed to share a comment about what the Fedora > > > Project is doing could be found on a list for that purpose not scattered > > > over multiple lists among people who want to know how to double boot Win > > > XP with Fedora. > > > > Yes. There is going to be a separate list for the board. You can read > > the archives and see the meeting mins. I have been doing weekly project > > reports to. > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/WeeklyReports > > > > > You know sometimes I wonder whether we all wander around in a world of > miscommunication. The web link above is just what I am trying to > advocate, Is it generally known that it exists? It has been published as part of fedoranews.org every week which is being announced to fedora-announce list. Red Hat magazine status reports include it. I have repeatedly posted to this list on several occasions before asking someone here to step up to provide a summary of important discussions here so that everybody can understand whats happening in this users list better. Noone stepped up to do the work involved but I hear complaints now and then that developers dont care about user opinions. If I ask to file bug reports in bugzilla, then people tell me bugzilla is a waste of their time. They wont post to fedora-devel about development discussions when they want it to reach developers. I am not sure what to do about that. Anybody who makes a reasonable amount of effort to track news updates should know about it. If not let them know. > I did not see a > reference to it in the e-mail about Fedora Foundation and Fedora Project > that was sent to the fedora-list. > How is a weekly report related to a foundation announcement? This is a weekly report I have been doing long before that and it has been published every week and fedoranews.org has been linking to it too. > I certainly appreciate your answering you on your own time but > understand that I ma carrying on this discussion also on my own time. > So we are sort of equal in this regard. Nah. I dont call you an apologist. Thats the difference. Rahul
