On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 13:31 -0500, akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:03:31AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 20:22 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > > I am personally fine with this. As always, you have my support and > > > utmost gratitude. > > > > > > The only objection that I have is that by tossing it out to the list, > > > you have invited the list to comment upon it but commentary on this > > > heavy traffic is more than you and the rest of the board, save Rahul > > > seem to want to deal with and you provided no other avenue for > > > commentary. > > > > Not all of the board needs to read all the comments and its not hard to > > follow a single thread even in a high traffic list. I can summarize and > > followup with the board on important questions if needed. If you have a > > better idea for getting feedback, we can take in that suggestion too. > > The floor is open. > > > > > > Rahul > It seems to me you need a separate list just for this purpose. You say this here but later conclude the separate lists diffuses communication. > You > filtering comments to members of the Board seems inadequate in my > view. Why not? I didnt hear much comments at all. I can point the entire thread to everyone involved if that helps better. > > Previously , in the face of complaints you told me I was on the > wrong list. Yes. Users talking among themselves arent going to reach developers. > Recently I happened to look at the number of fedora > lists and they are many. Yes. There are different sub projects. Not something unique about Fedora. > This diffuse channel for information > transmittal between the community and the board seems inefficient > and not conducive to communication. I dont see any problems but if you do, do you have any solutions? Rahul
