Washington, CJ (OCTO) wrote: > I found it easier to let the WinXP boot manager chain load GRUB > than the other way 'round. MicroSoft products like to be in > charge. While GRUB+Linux is not a good match, it is a reasonable > match, and works pretty well, whereas GRUB+WinXP is a poor match, > and the WinXP boot manager is a pretty reasonable tool. That's nonsense. Millions of people are using to grub to boot Linux and/or Windows. It works perfectly well. It's easier to install Windows first, but if you install Linux (with grub) first it is a good idea to save the MBR with something like dd if=/dev/hda of=mbr bs=512 count=1 Then you can replace it afterwards (if you want) with dd of=/dev/hda if=mbr bs=512 count=1 -- Timothy Murphy e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland