Timothy Murphy wrote:
Washington, CJ (OCTO) wrote:
I found it easier to let the WinXP boot manager chain load GRUB
than the other way 'round. MicroSoft products like to be in
charge. While GRUB+Linux is not a good match, it is a reasonable
match, and works pretty well, whereas GRUB+WinXP is a poor match,
and the WinXP boot manager is a pretty reasonable tool.
That's nonsense.
How can *you* know better than *I* what was easier
for *me*?
Millions of people are using to grub to boot Linux and/or Windows.
It works perfectly well.
I never said otherwise.
[rest of crap cut]
I have a machine which, if one overwrites the MBR, goes into
"recovery mode" and tries to reinstate WinXP as the boot.
You don't know *everything* in the world, do you.
So <insert your own favorite expletive here> off.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
