On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 13:20 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 10:04, Craig White wrote: > > > As for SELinux making a system 'unstable' - I can't envision a scenario > > that SELinux would do that. > > Frequency of updates is a good metric for stability. How many > SELinux updates have been issued since it was experimentally > included in fedora? FC2 had strict policy disabled by default. FC3 targeted policy had a dozen or so daemons. FC4 had 91. FC5 has a whole new reference policy and other changes and there has been a steady inflow of policy updates in every release. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/FC5Features Rahul
