--- Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 13:20 -0500, Les Mikesell > wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 10:04, Craig White wrote: > > > > > As for SELinux making a system 'unstable' - I > can't envision a scenario > > > that SELinux would do that. > > > > Frequency of updates is a good metric for > stability. How many > > SELinux updates have been issued since it was > experimentally > > included in fedora? > > FC2 had strict policy disabled by default. FC3 > targeted policy had a > dozen or so daemons. FC4 had 91. FC5 has a whole new > reference policy > and other changes and there has been a steady inflow > of policy updates > in every release. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/FC5Features > > Rahul > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > When it comes to SELinux, Fedora/RedHat lead the way, in the other post, I mentioned SUSE also because I read that they were incorporating it into their distro. Their efforts are not as strong as Fedora's as this from http://selinux.sourceforge.net/devel/kernel.php3 states that other distros that want to incorporate SELinux into their work it is As noted on the Userland Packages page, there are a number of userspace packages with patches for SELinux in order to leverage the SELinux kernel features. These patches must be ported to the packages included in a new distribution. When porting to a new distribution, it is likely best to port the latest SELinux patches from the Fedora Core development tree, as it has the most complete and up-to-date set of SELinux patches presently. http://selinux.sourceforge.net/distros/others.php3 Regards, Antonio __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
