On Wednesday 08 March 2006 12:51, Tony Heaton wrote: >I know I'm adding to it, but there has been more spam about UOL than > has come from UOL! > In which case your ISP is doing some prefiltering for you. Those that are getting it, are getting one for every post they make to the effected list, which includes this one, debian-user, fedora-legacy, fedora-docs, OOusers, and video4linux. Maybe more, but I'm not subbed to the whole world (yet). >On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:48 +0000, James Wilkinson wrote: >> Anne Wilson wrote: >> > Not all mail from uol.br.com is spam - I do get genuine mail that >> > I want to keep, so my procmail recipe just says >> > >> > :0 >> > >> > * ^From: .*Antispam >> > /dev/null> >> >> Personally, I use >> >> :0 >> >> * ^From.*\.sspam@uol\.com\.br >> /dev/null >> which seems to do the job. It looks as though all UOL "verification" >> spam ends in .sspam@xxxxxxxxxx, so the above line should *just* get >> the spam. >> >> Since my inbound e-mail comes via my ISP and fetchmail, I don't get >> to issue any rejects to UOL. But it looks as though Postfix, at >> least, can use regexps in its access table. So it should be able to >> trash the "verification" spam and let through the rest. >> >> James. >> >> -- >> E-mail address: james | _ This apostrophe >> @westexe.demon.co.uk | /'\ In case of emergency >> >> | \_/ Break glass to release >> | -- "Bruce" -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
