I know I'm adding to it, but there has been more spam about UOL than has come from UOL! On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 17:48 +0000, James Wilkinson wrote: > Anne Wilson wrote: > > Not all mail from uol.br.com is spam - I do get genuine mail that I want to > > keep, so my procmail recipe just says > > > > :0 > > * ^From: .*Antispam > > /dev/null> > > Personally, I use > :0 > * ^From.*\.sspam@uol\.com\.br > /dev/null > which seems to do the job. It looks as though all UOL "verification" > spam ends in .sspam@xxxxxxxxxx, so the above line should *just* get the > spam. > > Since my inbound e-mail comes via my ISP and fetchmail, I don't get to > issue any rejects to UOL. But it looks as though Postfix, at least, can > use regexps in its access table. So it should be able to trash the > "verification" spam and let through the rest. > > James. > > -- > E-mail address: james | _ This apostrophe > @westexe.demon.co.uk | /'\ In case of emergency > | \_/ Break glass to release > | -- "Bruce" > -- Tony Heaton CCN-9 (505)667-9015 Pager (505)996-3184 theaton@xxxxxxxx - "If you do nothing, they'll win"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
