gb spam wrote: > Perhaps you should check the list - it was "debated" at length there > with all pro-choice arguments dismissed, sometimes with valid points, > but often without valid points. I do subscribe to it... what was the thread called? A quick search on 'everything' in the last 30 days in Thunderbird showed lots of posts but not the magic thread as I could recognize it. >> because that at least has the >> possibility of convincing the people responsible for the code. > > Sadly not, anti-choice wouldn't listen to pro-choice. Their minds > were already made up, and the change was presented as a fait accompli. Ah well steady on, I could ask for a button that changes the installer background colour and use the same generic "anti choice" complaint when I was told where to stick my demand. Therefore it's not a useful observation. >> What should have happened differently? > > Well, its perfectly possible to make those that don't to use an option > and those that do want to use an option happy. Perhaps that could > have been considered? I'll read the thread you mentioned if you can point me to it. Some day, perhaps years from now, I likewise hope to convince someone about something on that list, hell, any mailing list. Or Internet forum. Hm in fact also living room. -Andy
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
