gb spam wrote: > On 3/6/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This is another example where the community is ignored when >>> important decisions are made. >> Its not very useful when you voice opinions where developers wouldnt >> hear them and then worry about getting ignored. > In this case it wasn't usful to voice opinions where developers do There is a fedora-devel-list that has a very strong ratio of devs to wannabes such as myself. If you seriously want this feature, you should go in there and start a thread because that at least has the possibility of convincing the people responsible for the code. > hear them - the install everthing voices were universally dismissed by > those that didn't want it. What should have happened differently? Personally I would get rid of the installer completely, it's a pervy one-shot bag of weirdness. -Andy
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
