On 3/7/06, Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > gb spam wrote: > > On 3/6/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> This is another example where the community is ignored when > >>> important decisions are made. > > >> Its not very useful when you voice opinions where developers wouldnt > >> hear them and then worry about getting ignored. > > > In this case it wasn't usful to voice opinions where developers do > > There is a fedora-devel-list that has a very strong ratio of devs to > wannabes such as myself. If you seriously want this feature, you should > go in there and start a thread Perhaps you should check the list - it was "debated" at length there with all pro-choice arguments dismissed, sometimes with valid points, but often without valid points. > because that at least has the > possibility of convincing the people responsible for the code. Sadly not, anti-choice wouldn't listen to pro-choice. Their minds were already made up, and the change was presented as a fait accompli. > What should have happened differently? Well, its perfectly possible to make those that don't to use an option and those that do want to use an option happy. Perhaps that could have been considered?
