On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 18:01 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 23:54 -0600, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > > > >> CentOS is taking a distribution created via someone else's hard work > >> and rebranding it as their own. They're essentially relying on Red > >> Hat Software, Inc., for all their distribution and release > >> engineering. I don't care for that. > >> > > Chris, this is not accurate: I understood that Centos is providing RHEL > > type of distributions for platforms not supported by RH. I believe that > > Sun Sparc fits in this category as well as the power pc architecture > > ppc32 fits this category. RHEL offers a ppc64 version. We are running it > on a cluster here. CentOS also offers an Alpha version in this category. > > CentOS does overlap RHEL in i386, x86_64, ia64. CentOS offers s390. I > thought RH did as well, but I don't see it in RHN channels. ---- CentOS 4 i386 provides i586 support whereas RHEL 4 does not. I don't know about s390. Craig
