On 2/22/06, Les Mikesell <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, it's not clear. First you complain about them removing > the tradmarks, then continue with a complaint about when > they tried to give some credit. Which is it you'd prefer? > They were never pretending to 'be' RedHat but they did > try to describe the origin and legal status of the product. I would prefer they leave the distribution of Red Hat Enterpise Linux to Red Hat Software, Incorporated. What you seem to be missing here is this, Les (and others): "I do not care what they do to be in the clear legally, I think they're in the moral wrong." I think dousing your wife in gasoline and setting her on fire when you're bored with her and want to marry someone else is morally wrong. There are some tribesmen in eastern India that disagree with me (the government there is, thankfully, on my side in that one). I feel that essentially ripping off Red Hat is morally wrong. You're free to disagree with me. -- Chris "I trust the Democrats to take away my money, which I can afford. I trust the Republicans to to take away my freedom, which I cannot."