On 2/23/06, Craig White <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > there are some things that you aren't considering... > > 1 - Red Hat isn't required to put all their SRPM's on the net - free for > download, they only need to provide the SRPM's to purchasers and that > could be via other methods...it's simply the method that they are > choosing. Thanks, Craig, for your insight. This here is something I'll have to give some thought to, and could very well change my opinion. In essence, by doing this, Red Hat Software is saying, "here's our source code. If you want to rebuild RHEL, knock yourselves out." This is the only counterpoint I've seen posted here that I feel has some weight worth considering. -- Chris "I trust the Democrats to take away my money, which I can afford. I trust the Republicans to take away my freedom, which I cannot."
