Re: ref: Microsoft barriers to Linux adoption on the desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Guy Fraser wrote:
On Tue, 2006-14-02 at 19:45 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:


Have you tried a really old version of SlackWare from around 1995 to see which machines it would run on?

I didn't think so.

Oh, I forgot to answer this. Yes, I've run Slackware.
It won't run on three of my machines: an 8088, an 80286,
and an 80386 with 1MB of RAM.

Have you ever tried LRP?
The last version of LRP that I used had a 1.3.?? kernel, and the whole system fit on a single 1.4 or 1.2 MB Floppy, but required about 8 MB of ram, because it ran from a ram disk, no hd required.

Then it won't run on any of the same three machines I mentioned
above.

Do you have any version of windows that will run on an 8088 or 80286?

Yes, I do.

The 8088 does not have a protected mode and is not suitable for true multitasking. The 80286 had a broken protected mode that was fixed in the 80386, but was still capable of limited protected mode operation and was minimally suitable to true multitasking. I had Windows 286, for my 16MHz 80286 and it was only a slight improvement over dosshell, I prefered Xtree gold over both.

It appears that you do, too. At least for the 80286.
I never ran and don't have Win 1.0, but IIRC, it ran on an 8088.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux