Re: df, lvm and 6TB arrays oh my!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert Locke wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:27 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
Robert Locke wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 08:22 -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
Robert Locke wrote:
OK, so lvdisplay showing the full amount is good, so the underlying
virtual partition is 6.36TB....  Now the tune2fs I was suggesting was
simply the -l option that would dump the ext2/3 superblock.  We should
be able to see the "block count" and the "block size" which when
multiplied should be 6.36TB.  Since you are at least on a 2.6 kernel, I
don't think we have the 2TB filesystem limit, though I don't remember
when that got bumped up to 32....

--Rob

I hate to be a complete idiot, but I can't get tune2fs to work on the lv, I must be doing something wrong. Can you use tune2fs on an lvm volume?

<big grin>

Should just be "tune2fs -l /dev/vgname/lvname".  So try:

tune2fs -l /dev/Volume02/Volume02lv
tune2fs -l /dev/Volume03/Volume03lv

That should generate about a page of each....

--Rob

I just got time to actually figure that out. I'm not a complete imbecile, I swear. Here's the output of one 6.36TB array:

ilesystem volume name:   <none>
Last mounted on:          <not available>
Filesystem UUID:          d775f424-2a12-44ac-9260-c00013f963ee
Filesystem magic number:  0xEF53
Filesystem revision #:    1 (dynamic)
Filesystem features: has_journal filetype needs_recovery sparse_super large_file
Default mount options:    (none)
Filesystem state:         clean
Errors behavior:          Continue
Filesystem OS type:       Linux
Inode count:              316325888
Block count:              632648704
Reserved block count:     31632435
Free blocks:              622713507
Free inodes:              316325877
First block:              0
Block size:               4096
Fragment size:            4096
Blocks per group:         32768
Fragments per group:      32768
Inodes per group:         16384
Inode blocks per group:   512
Filesystem created:       Thu Jan  5 13:41:11 2006
Last mount time:          Mon Feb 13 14:06:06 2006
Last write time:          Mon Feb 13 14:06:06 2006
Mount count:              2
Maximum mount count:      31
Last checked:             Thu Jan  5 13:41:11 2006
Check interval:           15552000 (6 months)
Next check after:         Tue Jul  4 14:41:11 2006
Reserved blocks uid:      0 (user root)
Reserved blocks gid:      0 (group root)
First inode:              11
Inode size:               128
Journal inode:            8
Default directory hash:   tea
Directory Hash Seed:      62d0ad33-5300-481b-8620-bbdb6fd30a5b
Journal backup:           inode blocks


Well, now we're in the not so good news....

Just doing the math....

(Block count * Block size) / 1024^4
(632648704 * 4096) / 1024^4 = 2.35 TB

So, what you are seeing in df is accurate as far as the filesystem is
concerned....

So, my thoughts are that perhaps someone originally created the logical
volumes at 2.4TB, created the filesystems, and then tried to extend the
logical volumes with lvextend?  Of course, while lvextend will grow the
underlying logical volume it does not grow the filesystem.  That is done
with the ext2online command, if the filesystem is mounted, and with
resize2fs if the filesystem is unmounted.

Can you check to see which of those two utilities you have available in
FC2?  Whether you have both resize2fs and ext2online?  Of course,
resizing the filesystem is potentially dangerous and presumes good
quality backups, and read, lots of disclaimers at this point about
eating your data for lunch......

--Rob


I created the volumes myself, all at once. I verified the size of the volume at each step. I had thought that it's possible that ext3 only formatted the 2.4TB extent and that resizing it might work. Fortunately I have one of these volumes not in use so I can test that and see how it goes. Thanks for all your help on this.


--
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux