On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 16:33 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 21:52 +0200, peter kostov wrote: > > I'm disappointed too. With The Gimp I believe man can achieve more than > > 90% of that what Photoshop does. And the average Photoshop user doesn't > > use even 10% of the functionality of Photoshop... > ---- > that sort of misses the point of feature glut - it doesn't really have > anything to do with need or usage...it's the comfort that it is actually > there. Some of the functionality that gimp is missing doesn't qualify as "feature glut" - they are features that are needed by a lot of users. For example, the lack of support for 16 bit colour and colour management, severely limits its usefulness to photographers. Fortunately these features are being worked on... :-)
