On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 11:29 -0500, taharka wrote: > I'm disappointed to see Adobe Photoshop riding at #1. Not needed when > you have the gimp. ...except that gimp can't do some of the stuff that photoshop can do, and some of that functionality is required by some of us. As a photographer I use gimp and photoshop for postprocessing images. I wish I could use gimp exclusively, but it just doesn't fill all my needs at the moment. The gap is closing, and I do expect that I will eventually be able to use gimp exclusively.
