Re: needed help on MINICOM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike McCarty wrote:

> I'd say, complicated to get going, but easy to use
> after that.

That was my experience when I did use it too.

> It's much better since being rewritten. It used not to
> work very well. Lots of SIGSEGV.

It does have some advantages... like working over ssh on a machine with
no X libs.  Some people swear by it.  The U-boot guys don't like it though

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/u-boot/u-boot/README?rev=HEAD

Minicom warning:
================

Over time, many people have reported problems when trying to use the
"minicom" terminal emulation program for serial download. I (wd)
consider minicom to be broken, and recommend not to use it. Under
Unix, I recommend to use C-Kermit for general purpose use (and
especially for kermit binary protocol download ("loadb" command), and
use "cu" for S-Record download ("loads" command).



Anyway I settled on Commi, which seems not to be maintained any more,
but since it just seems to work as far as intended and still compiles
that's not critical.

-Andy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux