Re: FC4 2.6.14 boot problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 10:16 -0800, M. Barnabas Luntzel wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 09:27 -0800, M. Barnabas Luntzel wrote:
> >> On Jan 11, 2006, at 1:41 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:43 -0800, M. Barnabas Luntzel wrote:
> >>>> Ever since I was upgraded (by smart) to 2.6.14, I have not been  
> >>>> able
> >>>> to boot any of these kernels. vmlinuz-2.6.13-1.1532_FC4 works  
> >>>> fine so
> >>>> I've at least had a working system. vmlinuz-2.6.14-1.1656_FC4 as  
> >>>> well
> >>>> as vmlinuz-2.6.14-1.1653_FC4 bomb out on boot with these messages:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Booting 'Fedora Core (2.6.14-1.1656_FC4)'
> >>>>
> >>>> root (hd0,0)
> >>>> Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
> >>>> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-1.1656_FC4 ro root=LABEL=/ quiet
> >>>> [Linux-bzimage, setup=0x1e00, size=0x178b66]
> >>>> initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.14-1.1656_FC4.img
> >>>> [Linux-initrd @ 0x37ec7000, 0x128125 bytes]
> >>>>
> >>>> Uncompressing Linux... OK, booting the kernel.
> >>>> Red Hat nash version 4.2.15 starting
> >>>> mkrootdev: label / not found
> >>>> mount: error 2 mounting ext3
> >>>> ERROR opening /dev/console!!!!: 2
> >>>> error dup2'ing fd of 0 to 0
> >>>> error dup2'ing fd of 0 to 1
> >>>> error dup2'ing fd of 0 to 2
> >>>> switchroot: mount failed: 22
> >>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
> >>>>
> >>>> is this some sort of udev problem? I've googled this to death and I
> >>>> cant find any resolution. tried giving different parameters to the
> >>>> boot line to no effect.
> >>>> explicitly setting root=/dev/sda1 did not work. it's an SATA
> >>>> drive...what gets me is that 2.6.13 worked fine, but any 2.6.14 is
> >>>> borked. so that indicates to me that the label on the disk is fine.
> >>>> the boot parameters for my 2.6.13 are identical.
> >>>>
> >>>> perhaps support for my SATA controller was removed? it seems
> >>>> doubtful. SiL 3114 SATA Raid PCI card. The difference between  
> >>>> the 13
> >>>> and 14 boot seems to be at the line right after "Red Hat nash  
> >>>> version
> >>>> 4.2.15 starting". the 13 gets to INIT, and the 14 bombs on  
> >>>> mkrootdev.
> >>>> It also seems less likely that ext3 support was taken out of
> >>>> 2.6.14 :)...I'm a little nervous about removing udev as it seems
> >>>> 2.6.13 uses it and I'd like to have a somewhat working system.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks for any help and sorry if I've left any important  
> >>>> information
> >>>> out.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Can you post your complete machine configuration.
> >>> Motherboard, memory, etc.
> >>
> >>
> >> mobo: Asus A7V880 KT880
> >> RAM: 1 GB single-channel PC3200 DDR400 (2x512 dimms)
> >>
> >> /proc/cpuinfo :
> >>
> >> processor       : 0
> >> vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
> >> cpu family      : 6
> >> model           : 8
> >> model name      : AMD Athlon(tm)
> >> stepping        : 1
> >> cpu MHz         : 1250.252
> >> cache size      : 256 KB
> >> fdiv_bug        : no
> >> hlt_bug         : no
> >> f00f_bug        : no
> >> coma_bug        : no
> >> fpu             : yes
> >> fpu_exception   : yes
> >> cpuid level     : 1
> >> wp              : yes
> >> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge
> >> mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow
> >> bogomips        : 2506.12
> >
> > I'm having a rather similar problem with my Dual Opteron / SCSI  
> > machine.
> > At least in my case 2.6.14/15 seem to have changed something that  
> > breaks
> > the PCI scan on ACPI machines. As far as I could see (by adding  
> > printks)
> > to the kernel, the PCI scan doesn't see most of the bus bridges and
> > devices on my machine.
> >
> > I'm not sure, but your problem seems very similar to mine.
> > Did you try using a vanilla kernel instead?
> 
> 
> ok I got a vanilla 2.6.14.1 kernel to boot. so something is funky/ 
> missing in the rpm build, right? what's next? 

Unless some in this list has any idea, I'd suggest you file a bug report
in:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com

Gilboa


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux