Re: kino, is it working ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: korgull@xxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kino, is it working ?
From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:41:04 -0500
Cc:
In-reply-to: <200601042226.03328.korgull@xxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, korgull@xxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200601042226.03328.korgull@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:26:03PM +0100, Marcel Janssen wrote:
> Has anyone got this working on a 64bit AMD ? 

I used kino (from Dag Wieers repository) a bit on FC3 x86_64, and had
a few problems with it hanging.  I never had time to investigate it.

Kino is great, and well worth fixing on 64-bit.

Now that Valgrind 3.1.x works on x86_64, you might consider
installing the various debuginfo rpms as necessary (*)
and attempting to identify the problem.

Regards,

	Bill Rugolsky

(*) rpm -qf is helpful to figure out which packages contain the
    libraries that are used by kino:

    ldd `which kino` | gawk '{print $3}' | xargs rpm -qf | sort -u

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kino, is it working ?
  - From: Marcel Janssen
- Re: kino, is it working ?
  - From: Marcel Janssen

References:
- kino, is it working ?
  - From: Marcel Janssen

Prev by Date: Re: YUM problem on new FC4 installation
Next by Date: fc4 on x86_64, gtk2 weird behaviour
Previous by thread: Re: kino, is it working ?
Next by thread: Re: kino, is it working ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]