In that case, I'd say that Pine is a better option because: A: It can be used via SSH or Telnet, whatever's your preference. B: I myself can't see the screen, and when I get a screen reader (speakup), the only one which works well is a command line screen reader which will not read the GUI. There is a gui screen reader for the GUI but it is unrelyable. Also, in my experience (and I am by no means a techy or whatever), command line programs are a lot more stable than GUI ones. There are my reasons for prefering Pine. I'm not being funny? But what have Evolution and Thunderbird got over pine? Except that they are GUI? Cheers, Chris Norman <!-- chris.norman4@xxxxxxxxxxxx --> Selling cheap but functional shell accounts. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Smith" <phhs80@xxxxxxxxx> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 9:58 AM Subject: Re: FC4 Pine replacement? On 12/31/05, Chris Norman <chris.norman4@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Evolution crashes a lot... I don't know about thunderbird, is it command > line? > > Sorry, but what is the point of using pine when one can use > Thunderbird, Evolution, and so on? Has pine got something so special > to make it your elected e-mail client? No, Thunderbird is not command line driven. Look at: http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/ Paul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
