Re: Yum dependencies [still]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 01:21, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > I really don't care whose fault it might be.
> 
> It actually is quite simple: Current livna's packaging/update strategy
> puts the rpm dependencies into an inconsistent state, i.e. this is a
> packaging bug.

If livna doesn't make a change, how can a problem be their fault?

> >  If you're going to provide 
> > an update, then the update should be complete, with any dependencies 
> > required.
> Yes. Fact is, livna's strategies breaks this rule.

How could they possibly have any other strategy?  The only solution
would be to hold back kernel releases until the dependent
modules are available.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux