On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 01:21, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > I really don't care whose fault it might be. > > It actually is quite simple: Current livna's packaging/update strategy > puts the rpm dependencies into an inconsistent state, i.e. this is a > packaging bug. If livna doesn't make a change, how can a problem be their fault? > > If you're going to provide > > an update, then the update should be complete, with any dependencies > > required. > Yes. Fact is, livna's strategies breaks this rule. How could they possibly have any other strategy? The only solution would be to hold back kernel releases until the dependent modules are available. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
