Re: GNOME updates vs. KDE updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GNOME updates vs. KDE updates
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:22:52 +0530
In-reply-to: <1135004556.25126.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1134927512.3248.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43A6B964.2070808@xxxxxxxxxx> <1135004556.25126.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050921 Red Hat/1.7.12-1.4.1

Hi

I can't say that I've noticed a Gnome update while I've been using Red
Hat or Fedora Core Linux, but I have noticed that an update to fix some
problem in KDE often means hundreds of megs of lots of KDE files then
need updating, too.  Would Gnome be the same?

More modular packages means that the size of the updates in generalwould be less.


regards
Rahul

References:
- GNOME updates vs. KDE updates
  - From: D. D. Brierton
- Re: GNOME updates vs. KDE updates
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: GNOME updates vs. KDE updates
  - From: Tim

Prev by Date: Re: GNOME updates vs. KDE updates
Next by Date: In Fedora Core 4, SOAP::Transport::HTTP looks for Apache.pm instead of Apache2.pm
Previous by thread: Re: GNOME updates vs. KDE updates
Next by thread: Wireless Media Server
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]