Gilboa: >>> Please, please, please stop PGP'ing your messages. It makes it very >>> hard to read them. François Patte: >> I promise...! Nathan Grennan: > I don't think you should have to stop using gpg on your messages. They > are perfectly readable to me. Plus it helps prove the message came from > you. If people let others use lame excuses to get them to stop using gpg > for e-mail then we will never get anywhere with it. I'm in two minds about PGP on here. On the one hand I don't mind the idea that people sign messages to *try* and confirm the message is from who you think it is, though I see a few that register as invalid (not just untrusted, but "the message may have been modified in transit warnings" occur). Then on the other hand, each time I come across a signed message I face a long what while gnupg tries to fetch the public key to go with the message. That process is none-too-quick, and grinds to a halt if I'm reading mail while YUM (for example) is doing stuff in the background. -- Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
