On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 14:23 -0700, Robin Laing wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 16:42 -0800, Ezra Nugroho wrote: > > > >>http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/index.html > >> > >> > > > > > > Eeeek! Not Tomshardware. > > In my experience, his views always seemed to follow how-ever advertises > > the most on this site. (Which is usually Intel) > > Well this article does not have a pro Intel conclusion. > > http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts_2005/index.html > > I am also an AMD man and from what I have read, AMD is not producing > more cutting edge and top line processors than Intel. > Umm...? By "more cutting edge" you mean what? Your own link seem to suggest that Intel is behind the performance curve. (And I still don't trust THG [Tom's Hardware Guid]) Gilboa
