On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 13:07 -0600, Jeff Vian wrote: > On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 07:10 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 21:32 -0500, David-Paul Niner wrote: > > > > > If you don't mind dedicating a box solely to this effort, you could try > > > the GPL'd version > > > of smoothwall, which is available here: > > > > > > http://www.smoothwall.org > > > > > > As I understand it, their relationship to the commercial product that > > > Smoothwall, Ltd. > > > sells is similar to the Fedora Project's relationship to RHEL: the > > > former is a testing > > > grounds for the later (although it doesn't appear to be as "open" a > > > process). > > > > > > For what it's worth I run the commercial version on my home network and > > > haven't > > > had any issues at all. And no, no one is paying me to say this! > > ---- > > this is a bit afield from OP's question but I have found ipcop > > <http://www.ipcop.org> to be a better system than smoothwall. > > > It may be somewhat better in ways, but it has an annual fee associated > with it. > ---- maybe I'm stupid but all I have seen is GNU GPL license and have never seen annual fee (I am presuming we are talking ipcop). Am I missing something? Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
