On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 07:10 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 21:32 -0500, David-Paul Niner wrote: > > > If you don't mind dedicating a box solely to this effort, you could try > > the GPL'd version > > of smoothwall, which is available here: > > > > http://www.smoothwall.org > > > > As I understand it, their relationship to the commercial product that > > Smoothwall, Ltd. > > sells is similar to the Fedora Project's relationship to RHEL: the > > former is a testing > > grounds for the later (although it doesn't appear to be as "open" a > > process). > > > > For what it's worth I run the commercial version on my home network and > > haven't > > had any issues at all. And no, no one is paying me to say this! > ---- > this is a bit afield from OP's question but I have found ipcop > <http://www.ipcop.org> to be a better system than smoothwall. > It may be somewhat better in ways, but it has an annual fee associated with it. > Craig > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. >
