Peter Gordon wrote:
Mike McCarty said:
I don't want two, three, five, you count'em partitions
on the disc, because then I'd have to know in advance how
much to allocate to each, and each would always be larger
than it would have to be. I'd rather have one partition,
and let the various pieces dynamically get resized as
needed.
Correct me if I'm misunderstanding, but isn't this the main purpose
of LVM and similar technologies?
I KNEW IT!
Someone was bound to pull LVM out of the hat! Even after
I specifically stated that LVM was not something I would
consider.
Whatever LVM is intended to accomplish, it is not something
I will willingly install on my machine at present. I already
have one machine I have to struggle with LVM on FC4, and that is
more than enough. I don't want to try to back-port it to my
FC2 machine.
Thanks for the kind message, though!
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
