Mike McCarty said: > I don't want two, three, five, you count'em partitions > on the disc, because then I'd have to know in advance how > much to allocate to each, and each would always be larger > than it would have to be. I'd rather have one partition, > and let the various pieces dynamically get resized as > needed. Correct me if I'm misunderstanding, but isn't this the main purpose of LVM and similar technologies? --Peter
