On Thu August 25 2005 10:43 pm, Phill Wolf wrote: > I have a Dell 2001FP monitor (1600x1200), but I just get a fuzzy > 1280x1024 with Fedora Core 4. The higher resolution is on the > pick-list in system-config-display, and if I pick it, the xorg.conf > line gets Modes including "1600x1200". But, next time X > reconstitutes, it doesn't work,* and when I look in Xorg.0.log, I see > good news followed by bad: > > (II) NV(0): Supported Future Video Modes: > (II) NV(0): #1: hsize: 1600 vsize 1200 refresh: 60 vid: 16553 > ... > (II) NV(0): Supported additional Video Mode: > (II) NV(0): clock: 162.0 MHz Image Size: 367 x 275 mm > (II) NV(0): h_active: 1600 h_sync: 1664 h_sync_end 1856 > h_blank_end 2160 h_border: 0 > (II) NV(0): v_active: 1200 v_sync: 1201 v_sync_end 1204 > v_blanking: 1250 v_border: 0 > ... > (II) NV(0): Mode "1600x1200" is larger than BIOS programmed panel > size of 1280 x 1024. Removing. > (II) NV(0): Not using default mode "1600x1200" (unknown reason) > [Those last two lines are repeated, appearing a total of 5 times.] > > What component is issuing this "larger than BIOS programmed panel > size" message? How can I explain to Fedora Core 4 that this video > board and monitor really, truly can display 1600x1200? (They did, in > Windows XP, before I deleted it in favor of Linux.) > > The video board is "NVidia GeForce 6800" in a "Dell Dimension 8400" > using "xorg-x11-6.8.2-37" and the "nv" driver, attached to a "Dell > 2001FP (Digital)". > Wish I could help, but, if it's any solace, I'm typing this response while looking at my Dell 2000FP running at 1600 X 1200, so it 'can work'. My guess would be that there's something wrong with the video driver, but I'm not sure how you'd fix it. Someone running your same card will hopefully step up. I run a 9200SE ATI with the ATI driver builds from Livna. -- Claude Jones Bluemont, VA, USA
