On Sunday 14 August 2005 11:03, akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I have sen those statements before but they explain very little. > If a new one is not ready and it has been not ready for more than > 6 months leave the old one works leave it in until the new one > arrives. If you look back at that threads concerning this, I think this very argument was made but I suspect the equation; "no maintainer = no inclusion" has pretty much become the De Facto policy at this date. Regards, Mike Klinke P.S. Thanks, guys, for the "bit rot" hint, I didn't seet hat. 8)
