On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 07:27:33AM -0500, Mike Klinke wrote: > On Sunday 14 August 2005 05:59, akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > system-logviewer-0.9.7-1.src.rpm > > > > > > -- > > > > But why it was dropped has not been fully explained. Also notice > > that the one in FC3 is a later version than the one you got by > > googling. It is a mystery which really should be explained to us > > grunts in the field by the decision makers out in Fedora-land. > > -- > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2005-June/msg00448.html > > ( no clue what the last two words in Rahul's reply mean ) > > > http://people.redhat.com/clumens/system-logviewer/ > > > Regards, Mike Klinke > I have sen those statements before but they explain very little. If a new one is not ready and it has been not ready for more than 6 months leave the old one works leave it in until the new one arrives. ======================================================================= Gordon's first law: If a research project is not worth doing, it is not worth doing well. ------------------------------------------- Aaron Konstam Computer Science Trinity University telephone: (210)-999-7484
