Re: Relative merits of various file systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Springer wrote:
=== Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:37:38 -0500
=== Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Anyone have a relative strengths/weaknesses of various file
systems commonly used with Linux? I have some feel for
ext2 and ext3 (I use ext3) and am more knowledgeable about
FAT12/16/32 than I really want to be. But how about reiser?
I also see others mentioned from time to time. How do
extended attributes fit in?

Mike


Don't miss:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems


Thomas

That looks *PERFECT*!

This group is wonderful!

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux