Re: Relative merits of various file systems

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Relative merits of various file systems
• From: Thomas Springer <th.springer@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:57:07 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

=== Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:37:38 -0500
=== Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Anyone have a relative strengths/weaknesses of various file
> systems commonly used with Linux? I have some feel for
> ext2 and ext3 (I use ext3) and am more knowledgeable about
> FAT12/16/32 than I really want to be. But how about reiser?
> I also see others mentioned from time to time. How do
> extended attributes fit in?
> 
> Mike

Don't miss:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems


Thomas

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Relative merits of various file systems
    • From: Mike McCarty

• References:
  • Relative merits of various file systems
    • From: Mike McCarty

• Prev by Date: Re: FC4: apache problem _without_ SELinux
• Next by Date: RE: OT: Should I learn bash/C/python/perl/other
• Previous by thread: Relative merits of various file systems
• Next by thread: Re: Relative merits of various file systems
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread