Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:40 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:Craig White wrote:On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 16:15 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
[snip]
What I did was pass along what I thought might be some useful information for a prospective user. Not write a criticism. Happier?---- happier? no. interesting that you criticized my sarcasm before resorting to your own.
No sarcasm intended. My intro to that section was: "For those with more interest." Presumably, that includes you. Presumably, seeing more information makes you happier, since you seemed to be complaining that I didn't give enough.
Your problems with copying the files would appear to have nothing to do with the ntfs kernel module - but rather related to the differences between NTFS and VFAT file name handling methodologies and Linux was indifferent to it.
Umm? Some of the copied file names got non-characters inserted into them. Like 0xC1 and 0xE1. That, I deem, has nothing to do with indifference to case distinctions.
I think you would have a much easier time of things if you shared the NTFS partition with samba to a Windows computer and allowed the Windows computer to copy the files as it understands the nuance of the filesystems.
Not to contradict what you say. It's true. However... The woman has only the one computer. It had Windows NT on it. She is removing NT and replacing it with W98 and wants eventually to put Linux on there, and make it a dual boot. In the meantime, she needs to read the data from the NTFS partition into her FAT32 with W98 on it. I'm just donating time trying to get her going. Granted a local copy is quicker than a network copy. But a
local copy that doesn't work vs. a networked copy that does work seems to have greater efficacy than writing script to rename files that still may have unanticipated results.
Agreed. Too bad she can't do that.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
