Re: Fedora4 possible rpm bug: listall.log disagrees w rpm -qa

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:28:28 -0600, Dave Blackburn wrote:

> After installing fedora 4, packages that I believe should have
> been installed were missing.
> 
> I did new custom install.
> 
> It seems to me that the following two counts should agree:
> 
> # rpm -qa | wc -l
> 890
> # wc -l install.log
> 1811 install.log
> # 

No. Wrong assumption.
 
> I registered with:
>   https://bugzilla.fedora.us/
> and tried searching but found nothing.
> Next, I tried to enter a bug but was unable.

Wrong site. That's the old Fedora Linux add-ons project.
Use http://bugzilla.redhat.com  ( see http://fedora.redhat.com )

> I discovered the listall.log vs rpm -qa discrepancy since
> I expected emacs to have been installed but it wasn't
> 
> # grep emacs install.log
> 1077:emacs-21.4-5.i386.rpm

"yum install emacs" -- It's not part of Fedora Core, but part
of Fedora Extras.

-- 
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Core release 5 (Development) - Linux 2.6.12-1.1446_FC5
loadavg: 2.08 2.37 2.36


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux