On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 07:23, Andy Pieters wrote: > Hi > > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 14:18, Kai Zhang wrote: > > No, 192.168.0.1 is on 192.168.0 network provided 255.255.255.0 as mask > > 192.168.1.1 is on 192.168.1 network provided 255.255.255.0 as mask > Thanks. > > Does that mean that we would have to put a head on the server and change its > ip to 192.168.0.10 for example? You can do that or you can assign an alias or interface on another machine to be in the matching subnet (it doesn't hurt to have overlaid subnets on the same wire) and ssh in to fix it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
