No, 192.168.0.1 is on 192.168.0 network provided 255.255.255.0 as mask 192.168.1.1 is on 192.168.1 network provided 255.255.255.0 as mask On 7/26/05, Andy Pieters <mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi All > > I have a question. > > Is 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.1.1 on the same subnet? > > I ask because someone is having a headless server that we are supposed to > connect to on 192.168.1.1 but it isn't replying and we are on 192.168.0.3 > > Thanks in advance > > > Andy > > -- > Registered Linux User Number 379093 > Cockroaches and socialites are the only things that can > stay up all night and eat anything. > Herb Caen > -- > -- --BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GAT/O/>E$ d-(---)>+ s:(+)>: a--(-)>? C++++$(+++) UL++++>++++$ P-(+)>++ > L+++>++++$ E---(-)@ W+++>+++$ !N@ o? !K? W--(---) !O !M- V-- PS++(+++) > PE--(-) Y+ PGP++(+++) t+(++) 5-- X++ R*(+)@ !tv b-() DI(+) D+(+++) G(+) > e>++++$@ h++(*) r-->++ y--()>++++ > -- ---END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > -- > Check out these few php utilities that I released > under the GPL2 and that are meant for use with a > php cli binary: > > http://www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/ > -- > > -- > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > >
