Re: Yum repros wanted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/25/05, Craig White <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 17:08 +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > I have seen a lot of bad things written
> > about Dag and about linva and I will decide which is the lesser evil,
> > and populate my yum.conf accordingly.
> ----
> there isn't bad - let's remember that these people are packaging these
> things without compensation.
> 
> there have been incompatibilities. That was on previous FC releases.
> FC-4 is certain to have much more compatibility between repositories.
> 
> My preference has thus far been toward the dag/freshrpms/atrpms/dries
> which is now the rpmforge group - especially considering that I use RHEL
> & CentOS for which most of their packaging is also available for those
> as well.
> 
> Craig
> 

I didn't mean to say that they are bad. I meant to say that bad was
spoken of them. In my personal opinion, these guys are great. As are
all the developers of FC and open source in general. Not to mention
those who contribute to the mailing lists. They are my teachers, and
my supporters, and I don't know where I'd be without them.

Dotan
http://lyricslist.com/lyrics/artist_albums/208/frankie_goes_to_hollywood.php
Frankie Goes To Hollywood Lyrics


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux